The lecture began by speaking about the editing of Ansel Adams photographs (see below). His photographs are edited using traditional methods of exposure by the use of different chemicals to create the affects he wanted. These traditional techniques of editing photographs are still true today with the use of software such as photoshop and the rest of the adobe suite images can be easily manipulated to the artists wants and needs whether that be for artwork or an ulterior motive such as cropping and changing messages/ the portray of people and events in the media (newspapers ect)
The idea of hiding the truth and manipulating images for goal is seen below, the photograph has been edited so that the woman's body is conforming to dominant ideas of sexuality and appearance. This is incredibly common in magazines that focus on beauty both in women and men, they can often be found with editing to the body and face to cover bruises, scars but also large changes in body shape too such as making a woman's waist smaller or the body look taller/ slimmer.
Throughout the lecture we were shown images banned from advertising were which included nudity or some form of sexual content. From the ending questions I'm unsure as to whether fine art is allowed to sit outside this censorship because it is seen as craft/ beautiful. Just because it has been painted instead of photographed doesn't necessarily mean that is allowed to sit outside law. The problem with censorship is that it depends on culture and community as to what is allowed to be shown, for instance what is allowed to be shown in the UK is very different to what is allowed in the media in other countries and cultures as our opinions on what should/should not be censored are extremely dependent on our own culture and people.